Showing 1 of 4

Opting In to Regionalization: Why the Risks for Western States Are Low

This Article assesses key risks to state authority that could arise from regionalization: federal jurisdiction may interfere with state clean energy policy, restrict states’ control over in-state energy resources, and preempt state law. The Article analyzes each of these risks in the context of Western regionalization and concludes that none ... (read more)

Who Owns Climate Litigation Awards?

This Article illustrates how the fragmentation of global climate harm into individual lawsuits, in which each local government seeks damages for its own mitigation and adaptation costs, could lead to a “first-sue, first-served” climate finance regime. This Article explores the benefits and risks of this litigation effort, the responsibilities of ... (read more)

What if We Understood What Animals Are Saying?: The Legal Impact of AI-Assisted Studies of Animal Communication

This Article explores the burgeoning fields of artificial intelligence and bioacoustics and their potential to reshape nonhuman animal law. (read more)

The Unexpected Implications of Sackett v. EPA on Water Quantity Allocations in the Arid West

This article takes a unique perspective on how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sackett v. EPA, which further restricted the scope of waters covered by the Clean Water Act, will impact water quantities in the arid West. (read more)

What's New

Private Law for Land Back

Sophie Allan

September 15th 2025

This Article describes the emerging role of private entities in returning land and land access to Indigenous peoples.

Worth a Double Take: The Removal of “Harm” from the Endangered Species Act

Olivia Grimes

September 4th 2025

Irrespective of the method of interpretation, the ESA is clearly designed to protect endangered and threatened species, as well as their habitats, to the greatest extent possible. Removing the definition of “harm” will prevent enforcement of the ESA against ongoing actions and render incidental taking permits nearly useless. Without effective ...

Judicial Stays of Agency Actions: Amplifying the Public Interest Factor in Ohio v. EPA

Olivia Grimes

July 20th 2025

Federal courts have the tremendous power to grant stays, which temporarily stop administrative agencies from implementing and enforcing new regulations. By delaying the benefits or harms of agency actions, these stays can have wide-ranging impacts, even before courts decide the legality of those actions. But the Supreme Court infrequently adheres ...

Volume 51.2 Front Matter

Malia Libby

April 10th 2025

Ecology Law Quarterly Volume 51.2 Front Matter

Foreword for Ecology Law Quarterly, Volume 51.2

Sophie Allan

April 10th 2025

We are honored to introduce Ecology Law Quarterly’s Annual Review for 2023–24 presented in this 51.2 edition. The Annual Review represents a unique opportunity to highlight the academic scholarship of Berkeley Law students. This year’s selection of cases range from covering landmark decisions on our nation’s foundational environmental statutes to ...

Establishing Incentives for Building Electrification through Congress: How to Strengthen and Accelerate Local Decarbonization Efforts

Sophie Allan

April 10th 2025

This Note argues that Congress can and should pass new federal building electrification legislation to protect, incentivize, and accelerate local electrification efforts.

Extraterritorial Toxics: Regulating California Hazardous Waste After National Pork Producers Council v. Ross

Sophie Allan

April 10th 2025

This Note analyzes and applies the Supreme Court’s reasoning in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (NPPC) to make two arguments. First, it argues the majority’s analysis of extraterritoriality in NPPC reinforces the case for overruling the previous “garbage cases” and refocusing the Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC) on protectionism. Second, ...

A Textualist’s Guide to “Waters of the United States” and Federal Environmental Statutes

Sophie Allan

April 10th 2025

This Note first examines how textualism’s plain meaning rule requires the enacted purposes canon. Next, it examines the Clean Water Act and its purposes section, which is ideal for interpretation under the enacted purposes canon because of its clarity, specificity, and comprehensiveness. Finally, it examines the conservative split in Sackett ...

Showing 17 - 24 of 443

ELQ at a Glance

54 Years
201 Issues
800+ Authors
143 Members
1,600+ Alumni

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay up to date about upcoming events and exciting news about our current members.