This Note explores how fracking has slipped through the cracks in a closely regulated industry. Examining the root of the problem, this Note outlines how we might design an administrative apparatus to address emerging environmental harms in the context of aging oil and gas infrastructure.

CAISO provides many benefits to Californians, but a West-wide RTO could provide even more. The urgent need to garner new sources of renewable electricity generation necessitates that California facilitate the creation of a regional grid operator that can effectively promote the development of new, green transmission lines.

To fulfill its statutory mandate under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should provide information about risk factors for developing cancer, both in terms of individual risk profiles and making the results of the registration and re-registration reviews more accessible to the ...

EPA’s unambiguous duty to consider alternatives can be a forceful tool to cancel duplicative, hazardous pesticides. EPA should take advantage of that authority to protect unsuspecting consumers from pesticides that can be easily replaced by less harmful ones.

This Note demonstrates that the Court’s surface water equitable apportionment doctrine, which primarily protects established uses, is insufficient to protect interstate groundwater resources.

Although solutions that curb whiplash are hard to come by in a country characterized by an increasingly polarized electorate, this Note suggests several avenues to consider within the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

This Note examines the fate of Proposition 65 in the aftermath of California Chamber of Commerce v. Council for Education & Research on Toxics, a 2022 Ninth Circuit case that affirmed a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the acrylamide cancer warning.

Cost Benefit Analysis is indeed irredeemably biased against climate action. It is also a fundamentally arbitrary metric to judge climate regulations aimed at preserving human health, safety, and the environment, and one which undermines the federal government’s stated commitment to environmental justice. The way forward is not better cost-justification of ...