Showing 1 of 7

2025 Annual Symposium — Foreword: Breathing Easier in a Polluted World

Foreword to Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, Toxic Exposures: Within and Without. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Introduction

Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium Introduction by Ellie Rubinstein and Liam Chun Hong Gunn. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Centering Pesticide-Affected Communities Through Outreach, Organization, and Advocacy

In the first panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed how farmworkers and farmworker families are overexposed and harmed by toxic chemical pesticides and how people are making a difference. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Beauty Justice: A Primer

In the second event of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, Arnedra Jordan discussed beauty justice, what it means, why it matters, and how it impacts our health. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Building Electrification: Protecting Public Health, Mitigating Climate Change, and Supporting Housing Justice

In the third panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed building electrification, which lies at the intersection of public health protection, climate change mitigation, and housing justice. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Toxic Exposures in Your Community: Strategies and Successes (Part I)

In the fourth panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed noxious facilities in local communities, specifically the Chevron refinery in Richmond and the proposed expansion of the Oakland International Airport, and community efforts to address these issues. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Toxic Exposures in Your Community: Strategies and Successes (Part II)

In the last event of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists expanded upon the themes of the prior panel with a specific discussion of health and environmental justice issues in the Bayview-Hunters Point community. (read more)

What's New

Frankenstein’s Mammoth: Anticipating the Global Legal Framework For De-Extinction

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

Scientists around the world are actively working toward de-extinction, the concept of bringing extinct species back to life. Before herds of woolly mammoths roam and flocks of passenger pigeons soar once again, the international community needs to consider what should be done about de- extinct species from a legal and ...

Accounting for Partial Settlements in CERCLA Private-Party Cost Allocation: No Rule Is the Best Rule

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

To the extent that litigation makes a muddle of private-party ordering, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act has created more messes than it has cleaned up. Congress enacted the Act to clean up hazardous waste spills. The litigious explosion that resulted, however, caused widespread and pervasive private sector ...

Foreword to the 2015-16 Annual Review

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

We are honored to introduce Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2015–2016 Annual Review of Environmental and Natural Resource Law. Now in its seventeenth year, the Annual Review is a collaborative endeavor. It is founded on Berkeley Law’s renowned environmental law program, which itself is built upon some of the leading scholars in ...

Climate Change and Compact Breaches: How The Supreme Court Missed an Opportunity to Incentivize Future Interstate-Water-Compact Compliance in Kansas v. Nebraska

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

Recklessly gambling with Kansas’s water rights to the Republican River, Nebraska used 17 percent more water than it was allocated by the interstate Republican River Compact during a drought in 2005–06. Kansas sued Nebraska for this breach of compact in the Supreme Court. While the Court ultimately found that Nebraska ...

No Relief: How the Ninth Circuit’s New Standard for Injunctions Threatens the Precautionary Nature of the Endangered Species Act

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest Service presents a troubling development for environmental plaintiffs seeking injunctive relief for procedural violations of the Endangered Species Act. The panel majority overturned a thirty-year-old presumption of irreparable harm, in a move that undermines the precautionary purpose of the Endangered Species Act.

Jurisdictional Determinations: An Important Battlefield in the Clean Water Act Fight

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

This Note provides a broad overview of section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the implications of its implementation regarding what constitutes “waters of the United States.” This Note focuses on the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempt to clarify the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act through the Clean Water ...

Standing in a Federal Agency’s Shoes: Should Third-Party Action Affect Redressability under the National Environmental Policy Act?

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

Through the doctrine of constitutional standing, federal courts have consistently attempted to limit their jurisdiction to claims in which they can redress the plaintiff’s injury. This determination becomes more complicated when a third party asserts that it would “replace” the defendant’s role and cause the same injury to the plaintiff ...

Alternative Reasoning: Why the Ninth Circuit Should Have Used NEPA in Setting Aside the Tongass Exemption

Julie Rose

March 25th 2020

After over a decade of controversy and litigation, the Ninth Circuit finally shielded the Tongass National Forest from road construction and timber harvest. In Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, the court’s en banc panel struck down the Forest Service’s decision to exempt the Tongass from the ...

Showing 329 - 336 of 471

ELQ at a Glance

54 Years
201 Issues
800+ Authors
143 Members
1,600+ Alumni

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay up to date about upcoming events and exciting news about our current members.