Showing 1 of 7

Incorrect & Pernicious: The Chlorpyrifos Litigation, Sugarbeet Growers, and the Proper Role of Courts in Arbitrary and Capricious Review

This Note explains how the Eighth Circuit found that EPA’s decision to ban the use of chlorpyrifos on food crops, which was based on the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation of its statutory mandate, was arbitrary and capricious. The Note then argues the reasoning employed by the Eighth Circuit to reach this ... (read more)

A Seat at the Table: How Texas v. New Mexico Provides Tribes a Potential Route to Assert Outstanding Water Rights Claims in Water Compact Disputes

This Note argues that, while it is far from guaranteed, Texas v. New Mexico may present Native American tribes with a unique way to finally see their water rights addressed in water compacts. (read more)

Who the ADVANCE Act Leaves Behind: The Neglected Needs of Nuclear Closure Communities

This Note examines past failed federal legislation to investigate why the ADVANCE Act may have lost its nuclear closure communities provision. This Note also discusses why nuclear closure communities deserve support, drawing parallels between the economic devastation that nuclear closure communities experience and the similar circumstances coal communities face in ... (read more)

Sea Change: Social Derisking America’s Offshore Wind

Offshore wind energy represents a critical opportunity for America’s clean energy transition, yet community opposition remains a significant barrier to its success. This paper introduces the concept of “social derisking,” which emphasizes stakeholder collaboration as a strategy to mitigate the risks of project delays and cancellations due to a lack ... (read more)

Endangered Justice? Exploring Corner Post’s Ripple Effects on Endangered Species Act Litigation

This Note argues that the Corner Post principle presents a transformative shift in environmental litigation, particularly under the Endangered Species Act, by extending the date for claim accrual and enabling plaintiffs to challenge longstanding agency regulations and decisions that continue to harm vulnerable species. This principle facilitates an opportunity for ... (read more)

Settling for More in Climate Litigation

As one of the first instances of success in American climate litigation, Navahine F. v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation demonstrates the potential of settlement in a climate litigant’s toolbox to maximize plaintiffs’ goals. This Note argues that settlement may provide an opportunity for climate litigants to obtain more concrete commitments ... (read more)

Navigating PFAS: Reevaluating the U.S. Navy’s Reliance on Aqueous Film-Forming Foam

This Note explores the environmental implications of AFFF use aboard Navy vessels, addressing both the current regulatory framework and ongoing litigation related to AFFF contamination. Analyzing the arguments for and against shipboard AFFF use, this Note recommends the Navy phase out AFFF on ships. (read more)

What's New

Energy Myths of the Nuclear Renaissance

ELQ Journal

April 11th 2008

Jim Harding * [ jump to end/comments ][ download PDF ] More than thirty years ago, my now-deceased colleague David Comey was asked to make a presentation before the annual meeting of the Atomic Industrial Forum, then the major trade association backing expansion of nuclear power worldwide.[1] He was asked ...

Submissions Guidelines

ELQ Journal

April 1st 2008

Ecology Law Currents welcomes submissions from academics, practitioners, policy makers, and students. Submissions should be on current environmental issues or cases. All submissions must be original, previously unpublished works and can be in the form of articles, essays, commentaries, or responses to articles published in ELQ. All pieces are searchable ...

Showing 457 - 458 of 458

ELQ at a Glance

54 Years
201 Issues
800+ Authors
143 Members
1,600+ Alumni

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay up to date about upcoming events and exciting news about our current members.