Showing 1 of 7

2025 Annual Symposium — Foreword: Breathing Easier in a Polluted World

Foreword to Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, Toxic Exposures: Within and Without. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Introduction

Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium Introduction by Ellie Rubinstein and Liam Chun Hong Gunn. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Centering Pesticide-Affected Communities Through Outreach, Organization, and Advocacy

In the first panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed how farmworkers and farmworker families are overexposed and harmed by toxic chemical pesticides and how people are making a difference. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Beauty Justice: A Primer

In the second event of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, Arnedra Jordan discussed beauty justice, what it means, why it matters, and how it impacts our health. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Building Electrification: Protecting Public Health, Mitigating Climate Change, and Supporting Housing Justice

In the third panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed building electrification, which lies at the intersection of public health protection, climate change mitigation, and housing justice. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Toxic Exposures in Your Community: Strategies and Successes (Part I)

In the fourth panel of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists discussed noxious facilities in local communities, specifically the Chevron refinery in Richmond and the proposed expansion of the Oakland International Airport, and community efforts to address these issues. (read more)

2025 Annual Symposium — Toxic Exposures in Your Community: Strategies and Successes (Part II)

In the last event of Ecology Law Quarterly’s 2025 Annual Symposium, panelists expanded upon the themes of the prior panel with a specific discussion of health and environmental justice issues in the Bayview-Hunters Point community. (read more)

What's New

It’s a Shore Thing: Applying the Public Trust Doctrine to Indiana’s Great Lake Shores in Gunderson v. State

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

Who owns the shore of Indiana’s section of Lake Michigan when it is not covered in water—a private landowner or the public? In February 2018, the Indiana Supreme Court held that the state of Indiana retains exclusive title up to the natural ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Lake Michigan. ...

Can the Precautionary Principle Save the Endangered Species Act from an Uncertain Climate Future?

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

Beginning in the 1980s, conservation groups began campaigning for the federal government to list the fluvial Arctic grayling—a relative of the salmon that lives only in the cold waters of North America—as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. In 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declined to ...

The Atlantic Coast Pipeline and the Pipeline Pipe Dream

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

For the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, a roughly six-hundred-mile natural gas pipeline stretching from West Virginia to North Carolina, a right-of-way to intersect the Appalachian Trail was essential. Although the proposed pipeline crossed below the trail by about six-hundred feet, it would require clearing of trees and plants along its length, ...

On the Borderline: Pakootas, NAFTA, and the Problem of Transboundary Pollution

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

The plaintiffs in Pakootas v. Teck Cominco faced a particularly challenging legal problem: not only was a large corporation polluting their local environment, but the corporation was located in Canada, while the plaintiffs lived in the United States. Although a variety of environmental agreements have been struck between the United ...

Urgenda: A How-To Guide for Enforcing Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets by Protecting Human Rights

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

The Supreme Court of the Netherlands ended 2019 as the first court in history to establish that protection from dangerous climate change is a human right thereby requiring the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to align with internationally recognized climate targets. The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation establishes ...

Unstable Elements: What the Fractured Decision in Virginia Uranium Means for the Future of Atomic Energy Act Preemption

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

In Virginia Uranium v. Warren, the Supreme Court wrestled with the question of whether Virginia was preempted from banning uranium mining with the goal of preventing milling and tailings disposal, activities that can only be regulated by the Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission. While the Court upheld Virginia’s ban, it did ...

The California Supreme Court on the Significance of Emissions under CEQA: Read Between the Lines

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

For California to meet its climate goals, there must be swift, bold infrastructure changes that facilitate decarbonization of the transportation sector. The California Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (Cleveland) is a mixed bag for those who would use the California Environmental ...

Transmission Impossible: The Case for a Nationwide Permit for Offshore Wind Transmission Lines

Internet Editor

February 16th 2021

The United States is drastically behind the rest of the world when it comes to offshore wind energy. With only one offshore wind farm in operation, developers have cited regulatory burdens and excessive litigation as two of the primary constraints on the industry. Currently, these developers must go through several ...

Showing 193 - 200 of 472

ELQ at a Glance

54 Years
201 Issues
800+ Authors
143 Members
1,600+ Alumni

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Stay up to date about upcoming events and exciting news about our current members.