Although solutions that curb whiplash are hard to come by in a country characterized by an increasingly polarized electorate, this Note suggests several avenues to consider within the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

This Note examines the fate of Proposition 65 in the aftermath of California Chamber of Commerce v. Council for Education & Research on Toxics, a 2022 Ninth Circuit case that affirmed a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the acrylamide cancer warning.

Cost Benefit Analysis is indeed irredeemably biased against climate action. It is also a fundamentally arbitrary metric to judge climate regulations aimed at preserving human health, safety, and the environment, and one which undermines the federal government’s stated commitment to environmental justice. The way forward is not better cost-justification of ...

Cumulative impact analysis (CIAs) under NEPA and CEQA are currently flawed. However, with the above amendments to NEPA and CEQA’s CIA frameworks, government agencies’ EAs of projects, such as the Project in San Bernardino, will be better positioned to consider and prioritize environmental justice concerns moving forward.

USDA’s ability to mitigate climate change through commodity subsidy programs exemplifies an area where bold, agency-led climate action is still possible, even after West Virginia.

United States v. Evergreen Resource Recovery, LLC shows the Fifth Circuit’s willingness to expand Seventh Amendment rights for jury trials to corporations under statutory claims. Finding a Seventh Amendment right for defendants under the Oil Pollution Act has potential implications for higher government expenditures, for greater outcome biases that may ...

This article discusses CLF v. Exxon Mobil, which limited agency deference by restricting the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction’s scope of application. It exposes issues beyond the simple adjudication of disputes and raises broader administrative and constitutional law questions.

The Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Trafigura makes it more difficult for environmental agencies to force polluters to pay for the damage that their businesses cause. The court’s reasoning has broad significance because it restricts the use of excise charges to remediate environmental dangers at home if the good in ...